mLUMEN
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 68 keywords for mLUMEN in Google Play
mLUMEN tracks 68 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 68 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.4, difficulty 45.9.
MLUMEN mobile application. Access to libraries, public data and the blogosphere.
Tracked keywords
68
0 ranked • 68 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.4
Top keyword: structured
Avg difficulty
45.9
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 65.9
structured
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 271
- 65.5
objects
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 50.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,075
- 65.1
consistent
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 371
- 65.8
measure
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 571
- 64.0
administration
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 110
Unranked opportunities
structured
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.2 • Competitors: 271
objects
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 50.9 • Competitors: 1,075
consistent
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.9 • Competitors: 371
measure
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.5 • Competitors: 571
administration
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.8 • Competitors: 110
High competition keywords
time
Total apps: 384,338 • Major competitors: 16,191
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.5
access
Total apps: 339,043 • Major competitors: 11,559
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.5
free
Total apps: 322,124 • Major competitors: 22,301
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 60.0
mobile
Total apps: 280,792 • Major competitors: 10,253
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.3
information
Total apps: 267,617 • Major competitors: 7,567
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.3
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| free | 65 | 100 | 60 | 88 322,124 competing apps Median installs: 4,278 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 22,301 major competitor apps |
| library | 71 | 100 | 56 | 72 32,400 competing apps Median installs: 1,829 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 1,559 major competitor apps |
| source | 72 | 100 | 48 | 70 25,796 competing apps Median installs: 1,836 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 939 major competitor apps |
| via | 68 | 100 | 53 | 81 116,161 competing apps Median installs: 1,484 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 4,252 major competitor apps |
| language | 69 | 100 | 54 | 76 62,071 competing apps Median installs: 2,203 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 2,472 major competitor apps |
| digital | 68 | 100 | 52 | 81 124,534 competing apps Median installs: 778 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 4,271 major competitor apps |
| information | 65 | 100 | 55 | 86 267,617 competing apps Median installs: 1,023 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 7,567 major competitor apps |
| content | 67 | 100 | 58 | 81 130,776 competing apps Median installs: 1,982 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 5,602 major competitor apps |
| using | 66 | 100 | 58 | 85 221,966 competing apps Median installs: 2,289 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 10,965 major competitor apps |
| time | 64 | 100 | 58 | 89 384,338 competing apps Median installs: 1,263 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 16,191 major competitor apps |
| available | 66 | 100 | 60 | 84 199,899 competing apps Median installs: 2,015 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 9,729 major competitor apps |
| mobile | 65 | 100 | 56 | 87 280,792 competing apps Median installs: 1,234 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 10,253 major competitor apps |
| basic | 71 | 100 | 50 | 73 38,278 competing apps Median installs: 2,606 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 1,721 major competitor apps |
| various | 67 | 100 | 54 | 82 139,841 competing apps Median installs: 2,620 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 7,811 major competitor apps |
| search | 67 | 100 | 60 | 82 131,336 competing apps Median installs: 2,553 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 6,363 major competitor apps |
| services | 68 | 100 | 56 | 80 103,678 competing apps Median installs: 918 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 4,001 major competitor apps |
| function | 71 | 100 | 48 | 73 37,188 competing apps Median installs: 2,988 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 1,825 major competitor apps |
| access | 65 | 100 | 59 | 88 339,043 competing apps Median installs: 1,013 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 11,559 major competitor apps |
| structured | 74 | 100 | 40 | 66 13,704 competing apps Median installs: 478 Avg rating: 1.7 | — | — | 271 major competitor apps |
| view | 66 | 100 | 56 | 84 183,815 competing apps Median installs: 786 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 5,710 major competitor apps |
| related | 70 | 100 | 49 | 76 57,474 competing apps Median installs: 1,486 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 1,780 major competitor apps |
| open | 68 | 100 | 56 | 79 96,321 competing apps Median installs: 3,204 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 6,626 major competitor apps |
| cultural | 73 | 100 | 41 | 68 17,403 competing apps Median installs: 843 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 302 major competitor apps |
| part | 69 | 100 | 54 | 77 67,671 competing apps Median installs: 1,502 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 2,898 major competitor apps |
| type | 70 | 100 | 53 | 75 49,421 competing apps Median installs: 3,058 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 2,612 major competitor apps |
App Description
MLUMEN mobile application. Access to libraries, public data and the blogosphere.
* selected resources of the National Library and Polish libraries of various types,
* selected resources of other public institutions via the dane.gov.pl portal,
* selected content from the Polish blogosphere (scientific, journalistic, cultural blogs, etc.).
All content is classified according to the structured and consistent information and search language of the National Library Descriptors (DBN).
The basic function of the application is the possibility of observing selected "topics" (constituting at the same time the National Library Descriptors) and browsing the newest objects related to them in the main view ("feed").
The application also allows you to search all resources available in it and go to source systems (e.g. texts of blog entries).
Using the application is free of charge.
The project was implemented under Measure 2.4 "Creating services and applications using public e-services and public sector information" of priority axis II "E-administration and open government" of the Digital Poland Operational Program. The remaining part was co-financed by the Minister of Culture and National Heritage.