Ltt.rs - JMAP Email client
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 100 keywords for Ltt.rs - JMAP Email client in Google Play
Ltt.rs - JMAP Email client tracks 100 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 100 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.7, difficulty 47.6.
No-frills, easy to use, Email client using the JSON Meta Application Protocol
Tracked keywords
100
0 ranked • 100 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.7
Top keyword: flow
Avg difficulty
47.6
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 65.7
flow
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 483
- 65.5
third
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 57.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 740
- 63.9
concept
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 367
- 65.7
license
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 47.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 775
- 64.0
heavy
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 46.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,199
Unranked opportunities
flow
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.9 • Competitors: 483
third
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 57.9 • Competitors: 740
concept
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.1 • Competitors: 367
license
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 47.4 • Competitors: 775
heavy
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 46.8 • Competitors: 1,199
High competition keywords
easy
Total apps: 328,697 • Major competitors: 14,659
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.3
make
Total apps: 328,331 • Major competitors: 18,397
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.0
find
Total apps: 305,963 • Major competitors: 16,284
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.8
like
Total apps: 288,688 • Major competitors: 20,645
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.7
using
Total apps: 222,760 • Major competitors: 11,093
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.2
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| offline | 68 | 100 | 56 | 80 110,968 competing apps Median installs: 3,318 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 6,484 major competitor apps |
| action | 71 | 100 | 58 | 73 38,468 competing apps Median installs: 5,314 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 3,544 major competitor apps |
| 69 | 100 | 50 | 77 69,207 competing apps Median installs: 2,082 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 2,885 major competitor apps | |
| library | 71 | 100 | 56 | 72 32,264 competing apps Median installs: 1,860 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 1,553 major competitor apps |
| right | 67 | 100 | 58 | 83 158,613 competing apps Median installs: 1,615 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 8,097 major competitor apps |
| source | 72 | 100 | 48 | 70 25,682 competing apps Median installs: 1,855 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 936 major competitor apps |
| source code | 71 | 100 | 62 | 50 1,365 competing apps Median installs: 2,350 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 58 major competitor apps |
| easy | 65 | 100 | 57 | 88 328,697 competing apps Median installs: 1,993 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 14,659 major competitor apps |
| make | 65 | 100 | 59 | 88 328,331 competing apps Median installs: 2,060 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 18,397 major competitor apps |
| external | 73 | 100 | 48 | 67 16,662 competing apps Median installs: 1,198 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 843 major competitor apps |
| party | 72 | 100 | 55 | 70 24,956 competing apps Median installs: 4,877 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 2,150 major competitor apps |
| support | 67 | 100 | 55 | 83 169,442 competing apps Median installs: 1,290 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 7,314 major competitor apps |
| users | 67 | 100 | 54 | 82 136,474 competing apps Median installs: 1,213 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 4,877 major competitor apps |
| design | 68 | 100 | 53 | 80 99,020 competing apps Median installs: 1,651 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 4,526 major competitor apps |
| storage | 72 | 100 | 59 | 70 24,662 competing apps Median installs: 3,182 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 1,729 major competitor apps |
| everything | 68 | 100 | 53 | 79 93,813 competing apps Median installs: 1,241 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 4,191 major competitor apps |
| using | 66 | 100 | 58 | 85 222,760 competing apps Median installs: 2,297 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 11,093 major competitor apps |
| find | 65 | 100 | 60 | 87 305,963 competing apps Median installs: 2,299 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 16,284 major competitor apps |
| available | 66 | 100 | 60 | 84 198,627 competing apps Median installs: 2,067 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 9,718 major competitor apps |
| account | 68 | 100 | 55 | 79 93,529 competing apps Median installs: 1,752 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 4,671 major competitor apps |
| code | 70 | 100 | 49 | 74 44,048 competing apps Median installs: 1,539 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 2,026 major competitor apps |
| trip | 72 | 100 | 45 | 69 21,998 competing apps Median installs: 1,418 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 947 major competitor apps |
| quality | 67 | 100 | 56 | 82 143,952 competing apps Median installs: 1,681 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 6,411 major competitor apps |
| flow | 74 | 100 | 42 | 66 13,236 competing apps Median installs: 1,163 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 483 major competitor apps |
| like | 65 | 100 | 63 | 87 288,688 competing apps Median installs: 3,650 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 20,645 major competitor apps |
App Description
No-frills, easy to use, Email client using the JSON Meta Application Protocol
To use Lttrs you need a JMAP (JSON Meta Application Protocol) capable mail server!
Features & Design considerations:
· Heavily cached but not fully offline capable. Ltt.rs makes use of JMAP’s great caching capabilities. However actions, such as marking a thread as read, need a round-trip to the server until their consequences like unread count are updated. Ltt.rs will ensure that the action itself won’t get lost even if performed while momentarily offline.
· No settings aside from account setup. Settings invite feature creep and make the app hard to maintain. Ltt.rs aims to support one specific work flow. Users who desire a different work flow may find K-9 Mail or FairEmail more suitable.
· Minimal external dependencies. Third party libraries are often of poor quality and end up being unmaintained. Therfore we will only rely on well known, well tested libraries from reputable vendors.
· Autocrypt as a first class feature¹. With its strict UX guidelines autocrypt fits right into Ltt.rs.
· Ltt.rs is based on jmap-mua, a headless email client, or a library that handles everything an email client would aside from data storage and UI. There is also lttrs-cli which uses the same library.
· When in doubt: Look at Gmail for inspiration.
¹: Planned feature
Ltt.rs is licensed under the Apache License 2.0. The source code is available on Codeberg: https://codeberg.org/iNPUTmice/lttrs-android