URCLEC
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 22 keywords for URCLEC in Google Play
URCLEC tracks 22 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 22 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 71.1, difficulty 44.0.
Renovated Union of Local Savings and Credit Banks
Tracked keywords
22
0 ranked • 22 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
71.1
Top keyword: union
Avg difficulty
44.0
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 60.6
union
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 136
- 64.2
managed
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 348
- 62.1
fund
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 412
- 64.0
regional
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 437
- 65.3
savings
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 743
Unranked opportunities
union
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 37.0 • Competitors: 136
managed
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.0 • Competitors: 348
fund
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.8 • Competitors: 412
regional
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.4 • Competitors: 437
savings
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.0 • Competitors: 743
High competition keywords
share
Total apps: 213,944 • Major competitors: 11,824
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.2
without
Total apps: 213,904 • Major competitors: 11,547
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.3
control
Total apps: 133,318 • Major competitors: 7,411
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.8
made
Total apps: 89,696 • Major competitors: 3,934
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.4
local
Total apps: 80,844 • Major competitors: 3,161
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.6
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| board | 72 | 100 | 46 | 71 28,195 competing apps Median installs: 2,500 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 1,625 major competitor apps |
| share | 66 | 100 | 58 | 85 213,944 competing apps Median installs: 2,921 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 11,824 major competitor apps |
| control | 67 | 100 | 54 | 82 133,318 competing apps Median installs: 1,825 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 7,411 major competitor apps |
| created | 70 | 100 | 48 | 76 56,343 competing apps Median installs: 1,933 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 2,197 major competitor apps |
| union | 74 | 100 | 37 | 61 6,326 competing apps Median installs: 1,771 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 136 major competitor apps |
| managed | 74 | 100 | 41 | 64 10,590 competing apps Median installs: 1,365 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 348 major competitor apps |
| without | 66 | 100 | 56 | 85 213,904 competing apps Median installs: 3,427 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 11,547 major competitor apps |
| made | 68 | 100 | 51 | 79 89,696 competing apps Median installs: 2,091 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 3,934 major competitor apps |
| provided | 70 | 100 | 46 | 74 46,649 competing apps Median installs: 2,592 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 1,645 major competitor apps |
| credit | 71 | 100 | 48 | 73 39,747 competing apps Median installs: 2,552 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 2,550 major competitor apps |
| local | 69 | 100 | 52 | 78 80,844 competing apps Median installs: 907 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 3,161 major competitor apps |
| monitoring | 72 | 100 | 43 | 71 26,938 competing apps Median installs: 688 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 608 major competitor apps |
| development | 71 | 100 | 45 | 72 33,132 competing apps Median installs: 1,291 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 1,042 major competitor apps |
| direct | 71 | 100 | 48 | 73 37,972 competing apps Median installs: 1,256 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 1,447 major competitor apps |
| fund | 74 | 100 | 40 | 62 7,904 competing apps Median installs: 993 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 412 major competitor apps |
| regional | 74 | 100 | 42 | 64 10,341 competing apps Median installs: 1,768 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 437 major competitor apps |
| committee | 72 | 100 | 32 | 52 1,734 competing apps Median installs: 711 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 33 major competitor apps |
| savings | 74 | 100 | 43 | 65 12,548 competing apps Median installs: 2,174 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 743 major competitor apps |
| born | 74 | 100 | 38 | 62 7,275 competing apps Median installs: 2,032 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 136 major competitor apps |
| elected | 70 | 100 | 28 | 46 746 competing apps Median installs: 894 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 14 major competitor apps |
| banks | 73 | 100 | 39 | 58 4,129 competing apps Median installs: 5,258 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 312 major competitor apps |
| representatives | 72 | 100 | 32 | 53 2,037 competing apps Median installs: 530 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 30 major competitor apps |
App Description
Renovated Union of Local Savings and Credit Banks
URCLEC was born from the Regional Development Fund (FDR). The latter, which was created in 1996, provided direct credit from a GTZ subsidy fund, without savings and without share capital.
It is managed by a board of directors, a credit committee and a control and monitoring committee made up of elected representatives of the farmers.