OCS-Plus
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 126 keywords for OCS-Plus in Google Play
OCS-Plus tracks 126 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 126 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 71.2, difficulty 45.1.
OCS-Plus is a cognitive screening tool developed at the University of Oxford.
Tracked keywords
126
0 ranked • 126 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
71.2
Top keyword: summary
Avg difficulty
45.1
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 63.7
summary
Opportunity: 75.0 • Difficulty: 49.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 274
- 64.4
collaboration
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 44.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 290
- 59.3
anonymous
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 451
- 66.1
university
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 180
- 64.8
collecting
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 732
Unranked opportunities
summary
Opportunity: 75.0 • Difficulty: 49.1 • Competitors: 274
collaboration
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 44.0 • Competitors: 290
anonymous
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.6 • Competitors: 451
university
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.8 • Competitors: 180
collecting
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.3 • Competitors: 732
High competition keywords
download
Total apps: 338,405 • Major competitors: 17,492
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.2
different
Total apps: 188,353 • Major competitors: 15,068
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.5
data
Total apps: 182,611 • Major competitors: 7,203
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.5
allows
Total apps: 177,280 • Major competitors: 6,479
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.9
provides
Total apps: 165,260 • Major competitors: 5,567
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.1
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| download | 65 | 100 | 56 | 88 338,405 competing apps Median installs: 2,107 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 17,492 major competitor apps |
| health | 69 | 100 | 49 | 77 69,935 competing apps Median installs: 770 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 1,974 major competitor apps |
| cloud storage | 72 | 100 | 71 | 52 1,810 competing apps Median installs: 3,393 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 169 major competitor apps |
| collaboration | 74 | 100 | 44 | 64 11,062 competing apps Median installs: 590 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 290 major competitor apps |
| version | 70 | 100 | 54 | 76 57,086 competing apps Median installs: 4,938 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 3,388 major competitor apps |
| via | 68 | 100 | 53 | 81 115,812 competing apps Median installs: 1,820 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 4,556 major competitor apps |
| graphical | 73 | 100 | 35 | 56 3,527 competing apps Median installs: 2,868 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 141 major competitor apps |
| within | 68 | 100 | 51 | 80 102,467 competing apps Median installs: 1,529 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 4,036 major competitor apps |
| individual | 71 | 100 | 49 | 73 38,249 competing apps Median installs: 1,420 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,147 major competitor apps |
| medical | 71 | 100 | 44 | 72 34,076 competing apps Median installs: 1,241 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 911 major competitor apps |
| collection | 68 | 100 | 51 | 80 100,218 competing apps Median installs: 3,860 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 4,638 major competitor apps |
| team | 69 | 100 | 52 | 79 86,017 competing apps Median installs: 1,463 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 4,232 major competitor apps |
| used | 68 | 100 | 54 | 81 115,888 competing apps Median installs: 3,156 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 5,095 major competitor apps |
| image | 70 | 100 | 50 | 76 56,150 competing apps Median installs: 3,411 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 3,265 major competitor apps |
| storage | 72 | 100 | 57 | 70 24,997 competing apps Median installs: 4,122 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,894 major competitor apps |
| secure | 68 | 100 | 55 | 80 107,096 competing apps Median installs: 894 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 4,636 major competitor apps |
| anonymous | 74 | 100 | 40 | 59 5,277 competing apps Median installs: 6,379 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 451 major competitor apps |
| connection | 69 | 100 | 53 | 77 64,158 competing apps Median installs: 2,656 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 3,247 major competitor apps |
| age | 73 | 100 | 45 | 68 20,045 competing apps Median installs: 5,094 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,431 major competitor apps |
| added | 71 | 100 | 51 | 74 41,521 competing apps Median installs: 4,589 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,601 major competitor apps |
| multiple | 67 | 100 | 55 | 82 131,625 competing apps Median installs: 2,903 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 9,050 major competitor apps |
| university | 74 | 100 | 41 | 66 14,221 competing apps Median installs: 1,724 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 180 major competitor apps |
| group | 70 | 100 | 53 | 75 48,417 competing apps Median installs: 1,402 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,898 major competitor apps |
| collecting | 74 | 100 | 42 | 65 11,759 competing apps Median installs: 3,272 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 732 major competitor apps |
| run | 70 | 100 | 51 | 74 44,921 competing apps Median installs: 3,903 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 3,636 major competitor apps |
App Description
OCS-Plus is a cognitive screening tool developed at the University of Oxford.
OCS-Plus is suitable for use with adults and provides health professionals with a brief cognitive assessment focussed on memory and executive attention. Normative data is provided for three age groups : under 60, between 60 and 70, and older than 70.
The OCS-Plus contains 10 subtests. The subtests are automatically scored and normed. When an OCS-plus assessment is completed, a visual snapshot report is automatically generated and can be stored locally on the device.
Users who download the OCS-Plus need to register with the research team to activate the app. There are two different user activations for the OCS-Plus app and each licence can be used to activate the OCS-Plus app on up to 4 individual devices.
1. A standard user activation, in which participants’ cognitive data cannot be uploaded and only a local copy of the assessment and its accompanying visual snapshot report are stored on the device. The participant’s performance is compared to normative cut-offs within the local version of the app. At the end of the assessment, the assessor is presented with a graphical summary of performance, which can be saved as an image locally and then printed/emailed/shared by the assessor via their professional accounts. Only up to 8 local sessions can be saved at any time. Further assessments require deleting previously stored local assessments within the app.
2. A research user activation, in which the locally stored anonymous participants’ cognitive data can be uploaded to the user’s assigned folder on secure cloud storage. The app can be run off-line and data uploaded when an internet connection is available. As with the standard version, only up to 8 local sessions can be saved. Further assessments require uploading of data or deleting of sessions. The research version of the app allows full data storage through user-directed manual uploading of the local app storage data to cloud storage associated uniquely with your licence and can be added to a research project collection where there are multiple researchers collecting data. For the research user licence, a collaboration and data sharing agreement between the University of Oxford and your institution will be required. In addition, there will be an administration fee for datastorage and set up, as well as regular downloads of the data (depending on length of project and sample size).
OCS-Plus is currently undergoing further research for validity of use in specific clinical groups and is not a medical device.
