OCS-Plus
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 126 keywords for OCS-Plus in Google Play
OCS-Plus tracks 126 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 126 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.0, difficulty 49.7.
OCS-Plus is a cognitive screening tool developed at the University of Oxford.
Tracked keywords
126
0 ranked • 126 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.0
Top keyword: age
Avg difficulty
49.7
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 68.4
age
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 47.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,318
- 68.5
standard
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 53.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,127
- 68.3
currently
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 50.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 877
- 67.7
stored
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 60.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,026
- 68.4
shared
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 73.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 982
Unranked opportunities
age
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 47.8 • Competitors: 1,318
standard
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 53.1 • Competitors: 1,127
currently
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 50.8 • Competitors: 877
stored
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 60.5 • Competitors: 1,026
shared
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 73.0 • Competitors: 982
High competition keywords
download
Total apps: 139,812 • Major competitors: 15,046
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.8
different
Total apps: 100,748 • Major competitors: 14,575
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.2
allows
Total apps: 77,278 • Major competitors: 7,086
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.6
provides
Total apps: 71,787 • Major competitors: 6,088
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 60.0
data
Total apps: 68,455 • Major competitors: 6,589
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 65.4
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| download | 65 | 100 | 60 | 88 139,812 competing apps Median installs: 34,022 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 15,046 major competitor apps |
| health | 70 | 100 | 52 | 75 23,713 competing apps Median installs: 25,526 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 1,845 major competitor apps |
| cloud storage | 69 | 100 | 70 | 50 856 competing apps Median installs: 56,204 Avg rating: 3.3 | — | — | 164 major competitor apps |
| collaboration | 71 | 100 | 47 | 60 3,380 competing apps Median installs: 22,040 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 274 major competitor apps |
| version | 69 | 100 | 61 | 77 30,986 competing apps Median installs: 38,306 Avg rating: 3.1 | — | — | 3,300 major competitor apps |
| via | 68 | 100 | 58 | 81 54,601 competing apps Median installs: 29,805 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 5,243 major competitor apps |
| graphical | 70 | 100 | 37 | 55 1,697 competing apps Median installs: 26,769 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 132 major competitor apps |
| within | 68 | 100 | 56 | 80 45,953 competing apps Median installs: 29,549 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 4,617 major competitor apps |
| individual | 71 | 100 | 54 | 71 15,144 competing apps Median installs: 20,930 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 1,085 major competitor apps |
| medical | 72 | 100 | 45 | 70 12,810 competing apps Median installs: 23,738 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 802 major competitor apps |
| collection | 68 | 100 | 54 | 80 49,948 competing apps Median installs: 28,272 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 4,345 major competitor apps |
| team | 69 | 100 | 58 | 78 34,741 competing apps Median installs: 33,606 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 4,020 major competitor apps |
| used | 67 | 100 | 61 | 82 61,233 competing apps Median installs: 32,225 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 5,711 major competitor apps |
| image | 70 | 100 | 54 | 76 27,195 competing apps Median installs: 35,290 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 3,073 major competitor apps |
| storage | 72 | 100 | 70 | 70 12,008 competing apps Median installs: 50,538 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 1,739 major competitor apps |
| secure | 69 | 100 | 66 | 78 35,889 competing apps Median installs: 30,578 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 4,055 major competitor apps |
| anonymous | 71 | 100 | 43 | 59 2,777 competing apps Median installs: 55,418 Avg rating: 3.2 | — | — | 415 major competitor apps |
| connection | 69 | 100 | 60 | 76 29,202 competing apps Median installs: 32,388 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 3,022 major competitor apps |
| age | 73 | 100 | 48 | 68 10,050 competing apps Median installs: 46,004 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 1,318 major competitor apps |
| added | 70 | 100 | 58 | 75 23,852 competing apps Median installs: 42,355 Avg rating: 2.9 | — | — | 2,862 major competitor apps |
| multiple | 67 | 100 | 62 | 82 58,884 competing apps Median installs: 44,428 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 8,314 major competitor apps |
| university | 72 | 100 | 41 | 64 5,845 competing apps Median installs: 14,036 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 164 major competitor apps |
| group | 71 | 100 | 63 | 73 19,138 competing apps Median installs: 24,928 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 1,759 major competitor apps |
| collecting | 72 | 100 | 46 | 65 6,059 competing apps Median installs: 38,813 Avg rating: 3.0 | — | — | 788 major competitor apps |
| run | 70 | 100 | 57 | 74 21,776 competing apps Median installs: 53,680 Avg rating: 3.1 | — | — | 3,447 major competitor apps |
App Description
OCS-Plus is a cognitive screening tool developed at the University of Oxford.
OCS-Plus is suitable for use with adults and provides health professionals with a brief cognitive assessment focussed on memory and executive attention. Normative data is provided for three age groups : under 60, between 60 and 70, and older than 70.
The OCS-Plus contains 10 subtests. The subtests are automatically scored and normed. When an OCS-plus assessment is completed, a visual snapshot report is automatically generated and can be stored locally on the device.
Users who download the OCS-Plus need to register with the research team to activate the app. There are two different user activations for the OCS-Plus app and each licence can be used to activate the OCS-Plus app on up to 4 individual devices.
1. A standard user activation, in which participants’ cognitive data cannot be uploaded and only a local copy of the assessment and its accompanying visual snapshot report are stored on the device. The participant’s performance is compared to normative cut-offs within the local version of the app. At the end of the assessment, the assessor is presented with a graphical summary of performance, which can be saved as an image locally and then printed/emailed/shared by the assessor via their professional accounts. Only up to 8 local sessions can be saved at any time. Further assessments require deleting previously stored local assessments within the app.
2. A research user activation, in which the locally stored anonymous participants’ cognitive data can be uploaded to the user’s assigned folder on secure cloud storage. The app can be run off-line and data uploaded when an internet connection is available. As with the standard version, only up to 8 local sessions can be saved. Further assessments require uploading of data or deleting of sessions. The research version of the app allows full data storage through user-directed manual uploading of the local app storage data to cloud storage associated uniquely with your licence and can be added to a research project collection where there are multiple researchers collecting data. For the research user licence, a collaboration and data sharing agreement between the University of Oxford and your institution will be required. In addition, there will be an administration fee for datastorage and set up, as well as regular downloads of the data (depending on length of project and sample size).
OCS-Plus is currently undergoing further research for validity of use in specific clinical groups and is not a medical device.
