OCS-Plus
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 126 keywords for OCS-Plus in Google Play
OCS-Plus tracks 126 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 126 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 71.2, difficulty 45.1.
OCS-Plus is a cognitive screening tool developed at the University of Oxford.
Tracked keywords
126
0 ranked • 126 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
71.2
Top keyword: collaboration
Avg difficulty
45.1
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 64.3
collaboration
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 45.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 284
- 66.1
university
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 176
- 64.9
collecting
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 737
- 61.2
length
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.9 • Rank —
Competitors: 362
- 60.2
sample
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 262
Unranked opportunities
collaboration
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 45.1 • Competitors: 284
university
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.8 • Competitors: 176
collecting
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.3 • Competitors: 737
length
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.9 • Competitors: 362
sample
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.5 • Competitors: 262
High competition keywords
download
Total apps: 327,114 • Major competitors: 17,085
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.2
different
Total apps: 185,799 • Major competitors: 14,975
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.5
allows
Total apps: 178,867 • Major competitors: 6,560
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.2
data
Total apps: 177,925 • Major competitors: 7,098
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.6
provides
Total apps: 167,026 • Major competitors: 5,622
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.1
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| download | 65 | 100 | 56 | 88 327,114 competing apps Median installs: 2,111 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 17,085 major competitor apps |
| health | 69 | 100 | 49 | 77 68,705 competing apps Median installs: 762 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 1,952 major competitor apps |
| cloud storage | 72 | 100 | 71 | 52 1,769 competing apps Median installs: 3,481 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 164 major competitor apps |
| collaboration | 74 | 100 | 45 | 64 10,889 competing apps Median installs: 581 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 284 major competitor apps |
| version | 70 | 100 | 54 | 76 56,554 competing apps Median installs: 4,929 Avg rating: 2.7 | — | — | 3,371 major competitor apps |
| via | 68 | 100 | 53 | 81 117,124 competing apps Median installs: 1,772 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 4,636 major competitor apps |
| graphical | 73 | 100 | 35 | 56 3,484 competing apps Median installs: 2,862 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 140 major competitor apps |
| within | 68 | 100 | 51 | 80 103,719 competing apps Median installs: 1,495 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 4,125 major competitor apps |
| individual | 71 | 100 | 49 | 73 37,768 competing apps Median installs: 1,419 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 1,137 major competitor apps |
| medical | 71 | 100 | 44 | 72 33,387 competing apps Median installs: 1,241 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 886 major competitor apps |
| collection | 68 | 100 | 51 | 80 98,749 competing apps Median installs: 3,761 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 4,565 major competitor apps |
| team | 69 | 100 | 52 | 79 84,725 competing apps Median installs: 1,451 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 4,214 major competitor apps |
| used | 68 | 100 | 55 | 81 117,045 competing apps Median installs: 3,069 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 5,195 major competitor apps |
| image | 70 | 100 | 50 | 76 55,254 competing apps Median installs: 3,369 Avg rating: 2.4 | — | — | 3,227 major competitor apps |
| storage | 72 | 100 | 57 | 70 24,322 competing apps Median installs: 4,092 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 1,872 major competitor apps |
| secure | 68 | 100 | 55 | 80 101,322 competing apps Median installs: 992 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 4,509 major competitor apps |
| anonymous | 73 | 100 | 40 | 59 5,131 competing apps Median installs: 6,464 Avg rating: 2.8 | — | — | 436 major competitor apps |
| connection | 69 | 100 | 53 | 76 62,896 competing apps Median installs: 2,650 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 3,206 major competitor apps |
| age | 73 | 100 | 45 | 68 19,489 competing apps Median installs: 5,209 Avg rating: 2.5 | — | — | 1,411 major competitor apps |
| added | 71 | 100 | 51 | 74 42,030 competing apps Median installs: 4,427 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 2,626 major competitor apps |
| multiple | 67 | 100 | 55 | 81 127,705 competing apps Median installs: 2,896 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 8,894 major competitor apps |
| university | 74 | 100 | 41 | 66 14,037 competing apps Median installs: 1,704 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 176 major competitor apps |
| group | 70 | 100 | 53 | 75 47,615 competing apps Median installs: 1,387 Avg rating: 2.3 | — | — | 1,878 major competitor apps |
| collecting | 74 | 100 | 42 | 65 11,867 competing apps Median installs: 3,141 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 737 major competitor apps |
| run | 70 | 100 | 51 | 74 43,864 competing apps Median installs: 3,923 Avg rating: 2.6 | — | — | 3,595 major competitor apps |
App Description
OCS-Plus is a cognitive screening tool developed at the University of Oxford.
OCS-Plus is suitable for use with adults and provides health professionals with a brief cognitive assessment focussed on memory and executive attention. Normative data is provided for three age groups : under 60, between 60 and 70, and older than 70.
The OCS-Plus contains 10 subtests. The subtests are automatically scored and normed. When an OCS-plus assessment is completed, a visual snapshot report is automatically generated and can be stored locally on the device.
Users who download the OCS-Plus need to register with the research team to activate the app. There are two different user activations for the OCS-Plus app and each licence can be used to activate the OCS-Plus app on up to 4 individual devices.
1. A standard user activation, in which participants’ cognitive data cannot be uploaded and only a local copy of the assessment and its accompanying visual snapshot report are stored on the device. The participant’s performance is compared to normative cut-offs within the local version of the app. At the end of the assessment, the assessor is presented with a graphical summary of performance, which can be saved as an image locally and then printed/emailed/shared by the assessor via their professional accounts. Only up to 8 local sessions can be saved at any time. Further assessments require deleting previously stored local assessments within the app.
2. A research user activation, in which the locally stored anonymous participants’ cognitive data can be uploaded to the user’s assigned folder on secure cloud storage. The app can be run off-line and data uploaded when an internet connection is available. As with the standard version, only up to 8 local sessions can be saved. Further assessments require uploading of data or deleting of sessions. The research version of the app allows full data storage through user-directed manual uploading of the local app storage data to cloud storage associated uniquely with your licence and can be added to a research project collection where there are multiple researchers collecting data. For the research user licence, a collaboration and data sharing agreement between the University of Oxford and your institution will be required. In addition, there will be an administration fee for datastorage and set up, as well as regular downloads of the data (depending on length of project and sample size).
OCS-Plus is currently undergoing further research for validity of use in specific clinical groups and is not a medical device.
