3D ECG Leads
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 75 keywords for 3D ECG Leads in Apple App Store
3D ECG Leads tracks 75 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 75 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.8, difficulty 36.7.
Tracked keywords
75
0 ranked • 75 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.8
Top keyword: positive
Avg difficulty
36.7
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 66.4
positive
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.0 • Rank —
Competitors: 63
- 65.1
due
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 61
- 65.1
visualize
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 43
- 64.0
purpose
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 26
- 64.9
recorded
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 43
Unranked opportunities
positive
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.0 • Competitors: 63
due
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.5 • Competitors: 61
visualize
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.3 • Competitors: 43
purpose
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 38.5 • Competitors: 26
recorded
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.1 • Competitors: 43
High competition keywords
way
Total apps: 106,696 • Major competitors: 1,250
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.1
simple
Total apps: 98,347 • Major competitors: 877
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 50.4
quality
Total apps: 52,922 • Major competitors: 476
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 47.8
may
Total apps: 52,327 • Major competitors: 891
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 48.4
tool
Total apps: 48,329 • Major competitors: 214
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 47.2
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| heart | 72 | 100 | 42 | 70 14,656 competing apps Median installs: 125 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 182 major competitor apps |
| medical | 71 | 100 | 43 | 72 19,219 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 73 major competitor apps |
| aimed | 71 | 100 | 34 | 56 2,210 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 10 major competitor apps |
| way | 66 | 100 | 51 | 84 106,696 competing apps Median installs: 125 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,250 major competitor apps |
| quality | 68 | 100 | 48 | 79 52,922 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 476 major competitor apps |
| tool | 69 | 100 | 47 | 78 48,329 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 214 major competitor apps |
| simple | 67 | 100 | 50 | 84 98,347 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 877 major competitor apps |
| part | 70 | 100 | 45 | 75 29,478 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 267 major competitor apps |
| aid | 72 | 100 | 37 | 61 4,574 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 26 major competitor apps |
| generating | 71 | 100 | 35 | 58 2,746 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 5 major competitor apps |
| must | 70 | 100 | 45 | 75 28,667 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 295 major competitor apps |
| interpretation | 70 | 100 | 31 | 51 1,166 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 3 major competitor apps |
| show | 69 | 100 | 46 | 76 36,473 competing apps Median installs: 150 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 454 major competitor apps |
| training | 70 | 100 | 45 | 74 27,084 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 192 major competitor apps |
| standard | 72 | 100 | 42 | 70 15,662 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 138 major competitor apps |
| positive | 73 | 100 | 40 | 66 9,284 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.4 | — | — | 63 major competitor apps |
| due | 73 | 100 | 40 | 65 7,725 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 61 major competitor apps |
| visualisation | 68 | 100 | 24 | 39 225 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 0 major competitor apps |
| scientific | 72 | 100 | 37 | 62 5,068 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 33 major competitor apps |
| et | 71 | 100 | 34 | 57 2,614 competing apps Median installs: 50 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 6 major competitor apps |
| interactive | 69 | 100 | 47 | 77 40,229 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 269 major competitor apps |
| technology | 70 | 100 | 45 | 74 25,801 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 187 major competitor apps |
| visualize | 73 | 100 | 39 | 65 7,775 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.3 | — | — | 43 major competitor apps |
| act | 72 | 100 | 37 | 61 4,220 competing apps Median installs: 100 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 51 major competitor apps |
| purpose | 73 | 100 | 39 | 64 6,649 competing apps Median installs: 75 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 26 major competitor apps |
App Description
AN ECG LEAD PLACEMENT GUIDE
Misplacement of the ECG Leads may lead to wrong diagnoses and further unnecessary investigations or treatments (Jowett et al., 2005; Toosi and Sochanski, 2008; Harrigan, Chan and Brady, 2012; Ilg and Lehmann, 2012; Lynch, 2014). In their study (Medani et al., 2018) showed that in only 34% of cases, the ECG Chest Leads were placed correctly.
All medical personnel who are operating a 12 Lead ECG machine should have the appropriate training for ECG lead placement (Kligfield et al., 2007; Crawford and Doherty, 2010). The purpose of 3D ECG Leads is not aimed at replacing high-quality training but instead, to act as an aid and to show you in a simple 3D interactive way the Standard Lead Placement Technique.
AN ECG LEADS VISUALISATION TOOL
In a standard 12 Lead ECG Tracing, not all of the ECG Leads are organized in anatomical order. One recent study (Lindow et al., 2019) highlights the fact that displaying all the 12 ECG Leads in an anatomical sequence has a positive impact in diagnosing Acute Myocardial Infarction. 3D ECG Leads serves as a 3D interactive tool for the anatomical visualization of the ECG Leads.
WHY ONLY 10 LEADS. HOW AN ECG LEAD IS GENERATED.
With 3D ECG Leads you can visualize how the ECG Machine reads the heart's electrical activity, and how 3 Electrodes are generating 6 Leads.
References
Crawford, J. and Doherty, L. (2010) “Ten steps to recording a standard 12-lead ECG,” Practice Nursing, 21(12). doi: 10.12968/pnur.2010.21.12.622.
Harrigan, R. A., Chan, T. C. and Brady, W. J. (2012) “Electrocardiographic electrode misplacement, misconnection, and artifact,” Journal of Emergency Medicine. Elsevier Ltd, 43(6). doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2012.02.024.
Ilg, K. J. and Lehmann, M. H. (2012) “Importance of recognizing pseudo-septal infarction due to electrocardiographic lead misplacement,” American Journal of Medicine. Elsevier Inc., 125(1). doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.04.023.
Jowett, N. I. et al. (2005) “Modified electrode placement must be recorded when performing 12-lead electrocardiograms,” Postgraduate Medical Journal, 81(952). doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2004.021204.
Kligfield, P. et al. (2007) “Recommendations for the Standardization and Interpretation of the Electrocardiogram: Part I: The Electrocardiogram and Its Technology A Scientific Statement From the American Heart As