3D ECG Leads
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 75 keywords for 3D ECG Leads in Apple App Store
3D ECG Leads tracks 75 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 75 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 49.1, difficulty 35.9.
Tracked keywords
75
0 ranked • 75 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
49.1
Top keyword: way
Avg difficulty
35.9
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 83.0
way
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 60.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 1,067
- 63.4
heart
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 47.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 153
- 59.3
medical
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 38.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 60
- 74.2
quality
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 52.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 383
- 69.1
tool
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 46.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 170
Unranked opportunities
way
Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 60.3 • Competitors: 1,067
heart
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 47.4 • Competitors: 153
medical
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 38.6 • Competitors: 60
quality
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 52.7 • Competitors: 383
tool
Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 46.5 • Competitors: 170
High competition keywords
way
Total apps: 4,665 • Major competitors: 1,067
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 60.3
may
Total apps: 3,755 • Major competitors: 871
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 61.6
simple
Total apps: 3,416 • Major competitors: 695
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.5
quality
Total apps: 1,906 • Major competitors: 383
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.7
show
Total apps: 1,889 • Major competitors: 446
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.4
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| heart | 58 | 100 | 47 | 63 635 competing apps Median installs: 271,300 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 153 major competitor apps |
| medical | 58 | 100 | 39 | 59 418 competing apps Median installs: 192,125 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 60 major competitor apps |
| aimed | 57 | 100 | 25 | 37 43 competing apps Median installs: 307,975 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 9 major competitor apps |
| way | 59 | 100 | 60 | 83 4,665 competing apps Median installs: 271,100 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 1,067 major competitor apps |
| quality | 58 | 100 | 53 | 74 1,906 competing apps Median installs: 248,725 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 383 major competitor apps |
| tool | 58 | 100 | 47 | 69 1,134 competing apps Median installs: 210,275 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 170 major competitor apps |
| simple | 58 | 100 | 54 | 80 3,416 competing apps Median installs: 254,625 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 695 major competitor apps |
| part | 58 | 100 | 54 | 69 1,154 competing apps Median installs: 268,538 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 247 major competitor apps |
| aid | 57 | 100 | 33 | 51 179 competing apps Median installs: 194,750 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 19 major competitor apps |
| generating | 57 | 100 | 25 | 39 53 competing apps Median installs: 168,625 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 3 major competitor apps |
| must | 58 | 100 | 51 | 72 1,481 competing apps Median installs: 253,250 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 288 major competitor apps |
| interpretation | 56 | 100 | 20 | 31 23 competing apps Median installs: 189,175 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 2 major competitor apps |
| show | 58 | 100 | 55 | 74 1,889 competing apps Median installs: 281,625 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 446 major competitor apps |
| training | 58 | 100 | 44 | 65 721 competing apps Median installs: 274,850 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 157 major competitor apps |
| standard | 58 | 100 | 43 | 62 541 competing apps Median installs: 259,950 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 114 major competitor apps |
| positive | 57 | 100 | 39 | 56 298 competing apps Median installs: 236,112 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 50 major competitor apps |
| due | 57 | 100 | 46 | 56 285 competing apps Median installs: 240,400 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 59 major competitor apps |
| visualisation | 0 | 18 | 8 | 11 2 competing apps Median installs: 299,350 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 0 major competitor apps |
| scientific | 57 | 100 | 36 | 48 136 competing apps Median installs: 239,950 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 22 major competitor apps |
| et | 20 | 100 | 43 | 30 20 competing apps Median installs: 555,450 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 8 major competitor apps |
| interactive | 58 | 100 | 50 | 70 1,265 competing apps Median installs: 235,925 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 228 major competitor apps |
| technology | 58 | 100 | 46 | 66 791 competing apps Median installs: 243,000 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 161 major competitor apps |
| visualize | 57 | 100 | 38 | 51 186 competing apps Median installs: 212,488 Avg rating: 4.7 | — | — | 35 major competitor apps |
| act | 57 | 100 | 43 | 50 170 competing apps Median installs: 297,050 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 42 major competitor apps |
| purpose | 57 | 100 | 34 | 47 124 competing apps Median installs: 242,175 Avg rating: 4.6 | — | — | 22 major competitor apps |
App Description
AN ECG LEAD PLACEMENT GUIDE
Misplacement of the ECG Leads may lead to wrong diagnoses and further unnecessary investigations or treatments (Jowett et al., 2005; Toosi and Sochanski, 2008; Harrigan, Chan and Brady, 2012; Ilg and Lehmann, 2012; Lynch, 2014). In their study (Medani et al., 2018) showed that in only 34% of cases, the ECG Chest Leads were placed correctly.
All medical personnel who are operating a 12 Lead ECG machine should have the appropriate training for ECG lead placement (Kligfield et al., 2007; Crawford and Doherty, 2010). The purpose of 3D ECG Leads is not aimed at replacing high-quality training but instead, to act as an aid and to show you in a simple 3D interactive way the Standard Lead Placement Technique.
AN ECG LEADS VISUALISATION TOOL
In a standard 12 Lead ECG Tracing, not all of the ECG Leads are organized in anatomical order. One recent study (Lindow et al., 2019) highlights the fact that displaying all the 12 ECG Leads in an anatomical sequence has a positive impact in diagnosing Acute Myocardial Infarction. 3D ECG Leads serves as a 3D interactive tool for the anatomical visualization of the ECG Leads.
WHY ONLY 10 LEADS. HOW AN ECG LEAD IS GENERATED.
With 3D ECG Leads you can visualize how the ECG Machine reads the heart's electrical activity, and how 3 Electrodes are generating 6 Leads.
References
Crawford, J. and Doherty, L. (2010) “Ten steps to recording a standard 12-lead ECG,” Practice Nursing, 21(12). doi: 10.12968/pnur.2010.21.12.622.
Harrigan, R. A., Chan, T. C. and Brady, W. J. (2012) “Electrocardiographic electrode misplacement, misconnection, and artifact,” Journal of Emergency Medicine. Elsevier Ltd, 43(6). doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2012.02.024.
Ilg, K. J. and Lehmann, M. H. (2012) “Importance of recognizing pseudo-septal infarction due to electrocardiographic lead misplacement,” American Journal of Medicine. Elsevier Inc., 125(1). doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.04.023.
Jowett, N. I. et al. (2005) “Modified electrode placement must be recorded when performing 12-lead electrocardiograms,” Postgraduate Medical Journal, 81(952). doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2004.021204.
Kligfield, P. et al. (2007) “Recommendations for the Standardization and Interpretation of the Electrocardiogram: Part I: The Electrocardiogram and Its Technology A Scientific Statement From the American Heart As