iLime

Developer: Department of Primary

Category: Productivity

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 66 keywords for iLime in Apple App Store

Developer: Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development Category: productivity

iLime tracks 66 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 66 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 48.8, difficulty 40.4.

Tracked keywords

0 ranked • 66 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

48.8

Top keyword: make

Avg difficulty

40.4

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

make

Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 62.7 • Rank —

Competitors: 1,773
88.4
way

Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 60.3 • Rank —

Competitors: 1,067
83.0
time

Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 62.9 • Rank —

Competitors: 1,805
88.7
support

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 55.8 • Rank —

Competitors: 515
77.7
users

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 52.5 • Rank —

Competitors: 430
74.6

Unranked opportunities

make

Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 62.7 • Competitors: 1,773
way

Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 60.3 • Competitors: 1,067
time

Opportunity: 59.0 • Difficulty: 62.9 • Competitors: 1,805
support

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 55.8 • Competitors: 515
users

Opportunity: 58.0 • Difficulty: 52.5 • Competitors: 430

High competition keywords

time

Total apps: 8,391 • Major competitors: 1,805

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.9
make

Total apps: 8,094 • Major competitors: 1,773

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.7
way

Total apps: 4,665 • Major competitors: 1,067

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 60.3
using

Total apps: 4,473 • Major competitors: 924

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 61.4
different

Total apps: 4,440 • Major competitors: 823

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.7

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
collaboration	20	100	53	46 102 competing apps Median installs: 425,400 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	26 major competitor apps
make	59	100	63	88 8,094 competing apps Median installs: 266,850 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	1,773 major competitor apps
support	58	100	56	78 2,741 competing apps Median installs: 233,950 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	515 major competitor apps
users	58	100	52	75 1,979 competing apps Median installs: 259,400 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	430 major competitor apps
tailored	58	100	53	66 836 competing apps Median installs: 291,662 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	179 major competitor apps
designed	58	100	54	80 3,407 competing apps Median installs: 230,000 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	624 major competitor apps
created	58	100	47	67 953 competing apps Median installs: 213,175 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	153 major competitor apps
spreadsheet	20	100	38	32 24 competing apps Median installs: 191,538 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	8 major competitor apps
way	59	100	60	83 4,665 competing apps Median installs: 271,100 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	1,067 major competitor apps
using	58	100	61	83 4,473 competing apps Median installs: 247,200 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	924 major competitor apps
built	58	100	46	66 855 competing apps Median installs: 239,450 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	175 major competitor apps
time	59	100	63	89 8,391 competing apps Median installs: 259,600 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	1,805 major competitor apps
mobile	58	100	60	81 3,947 competing apps Median installs: 251,675 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	846 major competitor apps
program	58	100	51	62 534 competing apps Median installs: 269,325 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	126 major competitor apps
intuitive	58	100	48	72 1,513 competing apps Median installs: 238,275 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	270 major competitor apps
explore	58	100	61	79 3,030 competing apps Median installs: 275,988 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	711 major competitor apps
interface	58	100	44	66 871 competing apps Median installs: 226,050 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	136 major competitor apps
around	58	100	60	78 2,784 competing apps Median installs: 275,088 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	645 major competitor apps
view	58	100	60	79 3,121 competing apps Median installs: 254,100 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	667 major competitor apps
provides	58	100	49	74 1,846 competing apps Median installs: 221,075 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	308 major competitor apps
tool	58	100	47	69 1,134 competing apps Median installs: 210,275 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	170 major competitor apps
decade	20	100	31	35 35 competing apps Median installs: 265,250 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	10 major competitor apps
backed	57	100	43	55 271 competing apps Median installs: 264,825 Avg rating: 4.7	—	—	57 major competitor apps
year	58	100	47	67 918 competing apps Median installs: 268,412 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	195 major competitor apps
feedback	58	100	48	66 871 competing apps Median installs: 261,525 Avg rating: 4.6	—	—	186 major competitor apps

App Description

Make smarter liming decisions backed by decades of WA research.
iLime is a decision-support tool designed in collaboration with farmers and consultants to estimate the long-term impact of lime application on soil pH, crop yield, and profitability. Built around the trusted Optlime model, iLime simplifies complex soil acidity calculations into a mobile interface that’s intuitive and field-ready.

Developed through ongoing cycles of feedback and refinement, iLime empowers users to explore different liming strategies—tailored to their soil, crop, fertiliser, and lime characteristics—and view their effects over a 20-year horizon.

iLime is based on the Optlime spreadsheet model, originally created during the 'Time to Lime' program (1996–2001) using field-tested principles of soil acidity. It has been extensively validated and enhanced with over a decade of Western Australian research.

Whether you're a grower, agronomist, or researcher, iLime provides a reliable, science-backed way to assess the economic and agronomic benefits of liming—where and when it counts.