Noise Gate & Downward Expander
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 126 keywords for Noise Gate & Downward Expander in Apple App Store
Noise Gate & Downward Expander tracks 126 keywords (13 keywords rank; 113 need traction). Key metrics: 0% top-10 coverage, opportunity 70.3, difficulty 39.5, best rank 28.
Tracked keywords
126
13 ranked • 113 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
0%
Best rank 28 • Latest leader 132
Avg opportunity
70.3
Top keyword: expand
Avg difficulty
39.5
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 67.2
expand
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 45.0 • Rank 132
Competitors: 226
- 64.0
volume
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.3 • Rank —
Competitors: 84
- 64.8
opening
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.1 • Rank —
Competitors: 91
- 68.3
reduce
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 151
- 63.6
idea
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 69
Unranked opportunities
volume
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.3 • Competitors: 84
opening
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 40.1 • Competitors: 91
reduce
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.2 • Competitors: 151
idea
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 39.2 • Competitors: 69
constantly
Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 42.9 • Competitors: 166
High competition keywords
time
Total apps: 190,736 • Major competitors: 2,966
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.3
make
Total apps: 159,506 • Major competitors: 2,928
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.9
every
Total apps: 120,649 • Major competitors: 2,494
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.0
using
Total apps: 115,141 • Major competitors: 1,548
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.5
way
Total apps: 107,117 • Major competitors: 1,932
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.5
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| expanded | 71 | 100 | 34 | 53 1,502 competing apps Median installs: 482 Avg rating: 4.1 | 28 | 28 | 26 major competitor apps |
| expanding | 72 | 100 | 37 | 59 3,453 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.2 | 34 | 33 | 63 major competitor apps |
| clear audio | 69 | 100 | 28 | 45 516 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 4.1 | 46 | 46 | 4 major competitor apps |
| audio quality | 68 | 100 | 25 | 40 254 competing apps Median installs: 900 Avg rating: 4.2 | 62 | 62 | 3 major competitor apps |
| quality sound | 69 | 100 | 27 | 44 435 competing apps Median installs: 775 Avg rating: 4.0 | 70 | 70 | 6 major competitor apps |
| quality audio | 70 | 100 | 32 | 52 1,248 competing apps Median installs: 750 Avg rating: 4.2 | 77 | 77 | 10 major competitor apps |
| sound quality | 69 | 100 | 33 | 44 440 competing apps Median installs: 1,500 Avg rating: 4.0 | 90 | 90 | 9 major competitor apps |
| expansion | 70 | 100 | 32 | 51 1,043 competing apps Median installs: 1,000 Avg rating: 4.1 | 116 | 116 | 10 major competitor apps |
| expansive | 70 | 100 | 34 | 51 1,044 competing apps Median installs: 1,100 Avg rating: 4.2 | 128 | 128 | 39 major competitor apps |
| expand | 73 | 100 | 45 | 67 10,410 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | 132 | 131 | 226 major competitor apps |
| reduction | 70 | 100 | 33 | 52 1,271 competing apps Median installs: 550 Avg rating: 4.1 | 159 | 159 | 23 major competitor apps |
| high sound | 66 | 100 | 18 | 30 65 competing apps Median installs: 600 Avg rating: 3.7 | 183 | 183 | 0 major competitor apps |
| clear sound | 67 | 100 | 23 | 38 182 competing apps Median installs: 1,125 Avg rating: 4.2 | 237 | 237 | 1 major competitor apps |
| level | 68 | 100 | 50 | 79 52,042 competing apps Median installs: 583 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 1,181 major competitor apps |
| challenge | 70 | 100 | 48 | 76 34,298 competing apps Median installs: 700 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 917 major competitor apps |
| change | 69 | 100 | 48 | 77 38,601 competing apps Median installs: 650 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 777 major competitor apps |
| make | 65 | 100 | 55 | 87 159,506 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,928 major competitor apps |
| simply | 69 | 100 | 48 | 78 44,654 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 594 major competitor apps |
| way | 66 | 100 | 53 | 84 107,117 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,932 major competitor apps |
| using | 66 | 100 | 53 | 85 115,141 competing apps Median installs: 500 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,548 major competitor apps |
| time | 65 | 100 | 55 | 88 190,736 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,966 major competitor apps |
| key | 69 | 100 | 48 | 78 46,710 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.2 | — | — | 535 major competitor apps |
| basic | 72 | 100 | 44 | 71 17,639 competing apps Median installs: 450 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 192 major competitor apps |
| process | 70 | 100 | 45 | 74 25,749 competing apps Median installs: 350 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 226 major competitor apps |
| volume | 73 | 100 | 40 | 64 6,670 competing apps Median installs: 650 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 84 major competitor apps |
App Description
Most of the iOS recording apps already come with a built-in noise gate effect. So why do you buy another noise gate? There are 2 main reasons: clearer sound and more natural gate-closing sound.
1 - DOWNWARD EXPANSION SOUNDS MORE NATURAL THAN OPEN & SHUT GATING
The simplest noise gate plugins simply set the volume to zero when the input level drops below a threshold. The abrupt change in volume from that process sounds unnatural and makes it obvious that you are using a noise gate plugin on the signal. Instead of using a gate that fluctuates between two states (open, closed), this plugin uses downward expansion to gently and smoothly reduce the gain as the input drops below the threshold setting.
An example to illustrate this:
With the downward expansion ratio set at 2:1 and the threshold at -10 dB, when the signal drops below the -10 dB threshold level, the plugin doubles its distance from the threshold. So a signal that comes in 2 dB below the threshold goes out 4 dB below; 10 dB below the threshold comes out 20 dB below, and so on. The big advantage to this method is that when the signal is just slightly below the threshold, say 1/2 dB for example, it won't be reduced all the way down to zero volume, so you don't hear an abrupt change as the signal drops below the threshold. Instead it just seems that the quiet sounds are even quieter, and they decay faster than they normally would. This allows you do eliminate a lot of background noise without the listener knowing that you are using a noise gate.
2 - SMOOTHER FILTERING IN THE ENVELOPE FOLLOWER MEANS LESS DISTORTION
The key challenge that all noise gate designs struggle to overcome is how to make sure the gate doesn't flutter open and closed several times at the end of a sound. This is a serious challenge because the input signal is a wave, meaning that it is constantly moving up and down and it crosses above and below the threshold with every up and down motion. How to keep the gate from opening and closing in time with the oscillation of the sound waves? There are many ways to do it, but the basic idea is to slow the gate down somehow, so it can't open and shut too quickly. Of course, slowing the gate down or delaying its closing is not desirable because we need it to close as quickly as possible when the input signal ends and open immediatel