Cereal Pest ID
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 45 keywords for Cereal Pest ID in Google Play
Cereal Pest ID tracks 45 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 45 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.9, difficulty 47.2.
Trained on a custom collection of insect pest photos and trained at the UofI
Tracked keywords
45
0 ranked • 45 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
70.9
Top keyword: university
Avg difficulty
47.2
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 66.1
university
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 180
- 63.8
pressure
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 587
- 62.6
seasonal
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 616
- 62.6
distribution
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 244
- 64.4
region
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 44.7 • Rank —
Competitors: 421
Unranked opportunities
university
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 40.8 • Competitors: 180
pressure
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.2 • Competitors: 587
seasonal
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.7 • Competitors: 616
distribution
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 38.5 • Competitors: 244
region
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 44.7 • Competitors: 421
High competition keywords
help
Total apps: 284,042 • Major competitors: 15,700
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.5
world
Total apps: 196,667 • Major competitors: 15,158
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.3
real
Total apps: 184,291 • Major competitors: 13,298
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.7
right
Total apps: 160,541 • Major competitors: 8,884
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.8
quick
Total apps: 143,911 • Major competitors: 6,895
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 54.9
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ready | 68 | 100 | 54 | 80 108,114 competing apps Median installs: 3,689 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 9,370 major competitor apps |
| right | 67 | 100 | 57 | 83 160,541 competing apps Median installs: 1,957 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 8,884 major competitor apps |
| reliable | 70 | 100 | 48 | 76 61,375 competing apps Median installs: 963 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 2,304 major competitor apps |
| collection | 68 | 100 | 51 | 80 100,511 competing apps Median installs: 3,882 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 4,649 major competitor apps |
| key | 68 | 100 | 52 | 81 123,194 competing apps Median installs: 1,394 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 5,923 major competitor apps |
| help | 65 | 100 | 58 | 87 284,042 competing apps Median installs: 2,040 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 15,700 major competitor apps |
| university | 74 | 100 | 41 | 66 14,258 competing apps Median installs: 1,743 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 180 major competitor apps |
| effective | 71 | 100 | 45 | 73 37,899 competing apps Median installs: 1,109 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 1,243 major competitor apps |
| community | 69 | 100 | 51 | 79 85,660 competing apps Median installs: 572 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 2,734 major competitor apps |
| hand | 71 | 100 | 45 | 72 32,134 competing apps Median installs: 2,098 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 1,711 major competitor apps |
| tool | 68 | 100 | 50 | 80 102,334 competing apps Median installs: 1,352 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 4,122 major competitor apps |
| ai | 70 | 100 | 56 | 75 52,960 competing apps Median installs: 1,859 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 3,109 major competitor apps |
| real | 66 | 100 | 57 | 84 184,291 competing apps Median installs: 2,403 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 13,298 major competitor apps |
| quick | 67 | 100 | 55 | 82 143,911 competing apps Median installs: 1,479 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 6,895 major competitor apps |
| pressure | 74 | 100 | 42 | 64 10,125 competing apps Median installs: 2,172 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 587 major competitor apps |
| project | 72 | 100 | 43 | 69 22,203 competing apps Median installs: 759 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 550 major competitor apps |
| important | 68 | 100 | 52 | 81 118,487 competing apps Median installs: 1,455 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 4,304 major competitor apps |
| world | 66 | 100 | 57 | 84 196,667 competing apps Median installs: 3,892 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 15,158 major competitor apps |
| photo | 69 | 100 | 54 | 77 65,849 competing apps Median installs: 4,965 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 5,349 major competitor apps |
| field | 72 | 100 | 44 | 71 28,371 competing apps Median installs: 1,184 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 700 major competitor apps |
| local | 69 | 100 | 52 | 79 86,001 competing apps Median installs: 810 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 3,226 major competitor apps |
| seasonal | 74 | 100 | 44 | 63 8,611 competing apps Median installs: 1,548 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 616 major competitor apps |
| learning | 68 | 100 | 51 | 80 105,079 competing apps Median installs: 1,291 Avg rating: 4.1 | — | — | 3,212 major competitor apps |
| upload | 71 | 100 | 52 | 73 36,329 competing apps Median installs: 1,697 Avg rating: 3.9 | — | — | 1,738 major competitor apps |
| research | 73 | 100 | 47 | 67 16,524 competing apps Median installs: 1,763 Avg rating: 4.0 | — | — | 609 major competitor apps |
App Description
Trained on a custom collection of insect pest photos and trained at the UofI
Built using a custom machine-learning model trained exclusively on hand-collected images of local pests, the app delivers fast, reliable identification in real-world conditions—right from your phone.
Key Features
• AI Pest Identification
Snap or upload a photo and our model identifies common cereal pests found in the Inland Northwest, trained entirely on region-specific images.
• Contribute to Regional Research
Every confirmed identification is placed anonymously on a research map, helping University of Idaho scientists better understand pest distribution and seasonal trends.
• Built for the Palouse
The pests targeted in this project are specific to the cereal-growing regions of Idaho, eastern Washington, and northeastern Oregon.
• Field-Ready Simplicity
Designed for quick use during scouting or field checks, with straightforward tools and no unnecessary complexity.
Why It Matters
Cereal pest pressure can vary dramatically across the Palouse. By combining AI identification with community-sourced mapping, this project supports early detection, better monitoring, and more effective integrated pest management.
