SAF Media Scanner

Developer: Andreas Kromke

Category: Music & Audio

192 installs

ratings

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 62 keywords for SAF Media Scanner in Google Play

Developer: Andreas Kromke Category: music_and_audio

SAF Media Scanner tracks 62 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 62 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 69.6, difficulty 50.2.

Auxiliary program for "Opus 1 Music Player" and "Unpopular Music Player"

Tracked keywords

0 ranked • 62 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

69.6

Top keyword: done

Avg difficulty

50.2

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

done

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 54.9 • Rank —

Competitors: 937
67.9
standard

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 53.1 • Rank —

Competitors: 1,127
68.5
source

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 52.0 • Rank —

Competitors: 959
69.3
storage

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 70.2 • Rank —

Competitors: 1,739
69.7
clients

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 47.9 • Rank —

Competitors: 451
64.3

Unranked opportunities

done

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 54.9 • Competitors: 937
standard

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 53.1 • Competitors: 1,127
source

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 52.0 • Competitors: 959
storage

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 70.2 • Competitors: 1,739
clients

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 47.9 • Competitors: 451

High competition keywords

like

Total apps: 150,415 • Major competitors: 21,531

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 68.5
access

Total apps: 126,428 • Major competitors: 11,667

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 66.6
available

Total apps: 92,463 • Major competitors: 9,952

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 66.4
support

Total apps: 68,575 • Major competitors: 7,371

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 59.8
android

Total apps: 63,851 • Major competitors: 7,412

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 75.6

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
music	69	100	66	78 34,918 competing apps Median installs: 33,764 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	4,538 major competitor apps
source	72	100	52	69 11,396 competing apps Median installs: 27,566 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	959 major competitor apps
via	68	100	58	81 54,601 competing apps Median installs: 29,805 Avg rating: 2.7	—	—	5,243 major competitor apps
support	67	100	60	83 68,575 competing apps Median installs: 34,249 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	7,371 major competitor apps
users	67	100	60	82 59,104 competing apps Median installs: 30,976 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	6,026 major competitor apps
audio	69	100	57	77 34,042 competing apps Median installs: 32,206 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	3,287 major competitor apps
product	71	100	51	74 20,165 competing apps Median installs: 31,040 Avg rating: 2.6	—	—	2,102 major competitor apps
used	67	100	61	82 61,233 competing apps Median installs: 32,225 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	5,711 major competitor apps
storage	72	100	70	70 12,008 competing apps Median installs: 50,538 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	1,739 major competitor apps
needs	70	100	52	75 24,331 competing apps Median installs: 30,717 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	2,732 major competitor apps
file	71	100	68	71 15,285 competing apps Median installs: 52,889 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	2,239 major competitor apps
available	66	100	66	85 92,463 competing apps Median installs: 34,120 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	9,952 major competitor apps
clients	72	100	48	64 5,797 competing apps Median installs: 19,192 Avg rating: 2.6	—	—	451 major competitor apps
program	71	100	47	73 19,009 competing apps Median installs: 26,294 Avg rating: 2.7	—	—	1,273 major competitor apps
note	71	100	53	72 16,600 competing apps Median installs: 34,914 Avg rating: 3.2	—	—	1,579 major competitor apps
tree	71	100	40	58 2,350 competing apps Median installs: 38,712 Avg rating: 3.1	—	—	279 major competitor apps
document	72	100	51	65 6,562 competing apps Median installs: 30,678 Avg rating: 2.7	—	—	782 major competitor apps
access	65	100	67	87 126,428 competing apps Median installs: 25,852 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	11,667 major competitor apps
open	68	100	60	80 47,669 competing apps Median installs: 50,678 Avg rating: 3.1	—	—	6,748 major competitor apps
yet	72	100	50	70 12,694 competing apps Median installs: 35,566 Avg rating: 3.1	—	—	1,595 major competitor apps
like	65	100	68	88 150,415 competing apps Median installs: 46,503 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	21,531 major competitor apps
player	70	100	58	76 26,262 competing apps Median installs: 52,125 Avg rating: 3.1	—	—	4,086 major competitor apps
google	69	100	86	77 30,153 competing apps Median installs: 44,000 Avg rating: 3.1	—	—	4,164 major competitor apps
network	70	100	56	75 24,379 competing apps Median installs: 36,741 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	2,898 major competitor apps
done	73	100	55	68 9,413 competing apps Median installs: 31,328 Avg rating: 2.7	—	—	937 major competitor apps

App Description

Auxiliary program for "Opus 1 Music Player" and "Unpopular Music Player"

A plain audio file metadata extractor ("scanner") especially for classical music. It basically creates SQLite databases to be used by player applications like the Unpopular Music Player or the Opus 1 Music Player.

Contrary to the Classical Music Scanner, the SAF Media Scanner exclusively uses Google's Storage Access Framework (SAF), thus allowing access to media not available via the standard methods (like USB storage with older Android versions or generally network shares).

Technically expressed, the program needs an "SAF Document Provider" with "Open Document Tree" resp. "FLAG_SUPPORTS_IS_CHILD" support. Note that especially Google Drive does not support tree access, while e.g. SMB and Nextcloud clients do.

As this is expected to be a niche product usable only for a few users there has not been any localisation done yet (except English).

The program is open source and ad-free.