Salvavidas Metodológico
ASO Keyword Dashboard
Tracking 63 keywords for Salvavidas Metodológico in Google Play
Salvavidas Metodológico tracks 63 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 63 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 71.4, difficulty 43.5.
Methodological lifeguard app for research
Tracked keywords
63
0 ranked • 63 not ranking yet
Top 10 coverage
—
Best rank — • Latest leader —
Avg opportunity
71.4
Top keyword: unit
Avg difficulty
43.5
Lower scores indicate easier wins
Opportunity leaders
- 64.4
unit
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.6 • Rank —
Competitors: 366
- 65.5
routine
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.8 • Rank —
Competitors: 497
- 62.8
assign
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 44.2 • Rank —
Competitors: 243
- 61.5
properties
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.4 • Rank —
Competitors: 222
- 65.7
direction
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.5 • Rank —
Competitors: 754
Unranked opportunities
unit
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.6 • Competitors: 366
routine
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.8 • Competitors: 497
assign
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 44.2 • Competitors: 243
properties
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.4 • Competitors: 222
direction
Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.5 • Competitors: 754
High competition keywords
best
Total apps: 255,681 • Major competitors: 16,876
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.8
using
Total apps: 221,622 • Major competitors: 10,931
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.9
whether
Total apps: 192,295 • Major competitors: 6,803
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.6
different
Total apps: 187,617 • Major competitors: 13,682
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.9
order
Total apps: 142,070 • Major competitors: 4,026
Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 52.0
All tracked keywords
Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks
| Major Competitors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| best | 66 | 100 | 59 | 86 255,681 competing apps Median installs: 3,149 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 16,876 major competitor apps |
| order | 67 | 100 | 52 | 82 142,070 competing apps Median installs: 480 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 4,026 major competitor apps |
| device | 68 | 100 | 63 | 80 108,013 competing apps Median installs: 2,605 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 6,164 major competitor apps |
| whether | 66 | 100 | 54 | 84 192,295 competing apps Median installs: 878 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 6,803 major competitor apps |
| within | 68 | 100 | 52 | 80 102,646 competing apps Median installs: 1,276 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 3,668 major competitor apps |
| design | 68 | 100 | 53 | 80 99,542 competing apps Median installs: 1,620 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 4,521 major competitor apps |
| medical | 71 | 100 | 44 | 72 33,929 competing apps Median installs: 1,038 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 840 major competitor apps |
| used | 68 | 100 | 55 | 81 116,056 competing apps Median installs: 2,382 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 4,638 major competitor apps |
| using | 66 | 100 | 58 | 85 221,622 competing apps Median installs: 2,286 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 10,931 major competitor apps |
| provide | 67 | 100 | 52 | 82 136,710 competing apps Median installs: 1,364 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 4,391 major competitor apps |
| account | 68 | 100 | 55 | 79 93,998 competing apps Median installs: 1,719 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 4,674 major competitor apps |
| together | 70 | 100 | 50 | 74 42,869 competing apps Median installs: 1,740 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 2,217 major competitor apps |
| type | 70 | 100 | 53 | 75 49,433 competing apps Median installs: 3,053 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 2,609 major competitor apps |
| choice | 71 | 100 | 48 | 73 40,420 competing apps Median installs: 3,556 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 2,524 major competitor apps |
| specifically | 72 | 100 | 44 | 71 27,060 competing apps Median installs: 732 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 539 major competitor apps |
| guide | 69 | 100 | 48 | 77 71,719 competing apps Median installs: 1,279 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 2,016 major competitor apps |
| unit | 74 | 100 | 43 | 64 11,057 competing apps Median installs: 1,236 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 366 major competitor apps |
| random | 73 | 100 | 47 | 69 20,691 competing apps Median installs: 2,899 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 1,287 major competitor apps |
| routine | 74 | 100 | 42 | 65 12,890 competing apps Median installs: 860 Avg rating: 1.9 | — | — | 497 major competitor apps |
| different | 66 | 100 | 58 | 84 187,617 competing apps Median installs: 4,006 Avg rating: 2.2 | — | — | 13,682 major competitor apps |
| according | 70 | 100 | 46 | 74 45,381 competing apps Median installs: 3,276 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 1,872 major competitor apps |
| assign | 74 | 100 | 44 | 63 8,804 competing apps Median installs: 664 Avg rating: 1.8 | — | — | 243 major competitor apps |
| select | 68 | 100 | 57 | 80 99,873 competing apps Median installs: 2,297 Avg rating: 2.1 | — | — | 5,610 major competitor apps |
| specify | 73 | 100 | 36 | 58 4,605 competing apps Median installs: 1,849 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 143 major competitor apps |
| suit | 72 | 100 | 47 | 71 29,394 competing apps Median installs: 2,181 Avg rating: 2.0 | — | — | 1,533 major competitor apps |
App Description
Methodological lifeguard app for research
Through the choice of the capacity to assign the study or intervention factor and the development of routine clinical practice during the study design, depending on the purpose of the study, the existence of follow-up, cause-effect direction or random assignment, and whether the unit of study is the individual, the device can be used to select the type of design that best suits each situation within a research study, specifically in the development of the methodology.
In addition, by evaluating the study according to whether or not routine clinical practice is applied, together with the evaluation of the intervention or not using a drug or medical device and the need for insurance and / or contract, the application evaluates the selection of the regulations and the procedures to be considered that best suit each research study, in order to contemplate its evaluation and approval by a Research Ethics Committee.