Salvavidas Metodológico

Developer: UIT APPs Ciudad

Category: Education

457 installs

ratings

+5 monthly installs

trend steady

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 63 keywords for Salvavidas Metodológico in Google Play

Developer: UIT APPs Ciudad Real Category: education

Salvavidas Metodológico tracks 63 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 63 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 70.1, difficulty 45.8.

Methodological lifeguard app for research

Tracked keywords

0 ranked • 63 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

70.1

Top keyword: specifically

Avg difficulty

45.8

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

specifically

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 45.7 • Rank —

Competitors: 651
68.6
random

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 50.5 • Rank —

Competitors: 1,316
68.3
steps

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 46.7 • Rank —

Competitors: 1,066
68.5
medical

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 44.6 • Rank —

Competitors: 802
70.2
unit

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 45.2 • Rank —

Competitors: 360
62.2

Unranked opportunities

specifically

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 45.7 • Competitors: 651
random

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 50.5 • Competitors: 1,316
steps

Opportunity: 73.0 • Difficulty: 46.7 • Competitors: 1,066
medical

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 44.6 • Competitors: 802
unit

Opportunity: 72.0 • Difficulty: 45.2 • Competitors: 360

High competition keywords

best

Total apps: 131,644 • Major competitors: 18,001

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 63.2
using

Total apps: 114,758 • Major competitors: 13,323

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 64.0
different

Total apps: 100,748 • Major competitors: 14,575

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 62.2
whether

Total apps: 76,585 • Major competitors: 8,596

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 58.0
provide

Total apps: 61,536 • Major competitors: 5,453

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 55.5

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
best	65	100	63	87 131,644 competing apps Median installs: 43,740 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	18,001 major competitor apps
order	68	100	55	79 44,242 competing apps Median installs: 25,117 Avg rating: 2.7	—	—	4,188 major competitor apps
device	68	100	72	81 52,389 competing apps Median installs: 37,519 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	6,390 major competitor apps
whether	67	100	58	83 76,585 competing apps Median installs: 31,919 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	8,596 major competitor apps
within	68	100	56	80 45,953 competing apps Median installs: 29,549 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	4,617 major competitor apps
design	68	100	56	79 41,673 competing apps Median installs: 30,529 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	4,566 major competitor apps
medical	72	100	45	70 12,810 competing apps Median installs: 23,738 Avg rating: 2.6	—	—	802 major competitor apps
used	67	100	61	82 61,233 competing apps Median installs: 32,225 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	5,711 major competitor apps
using	65	100	64	86 114,758 competing apps Median installs: 37,480 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	13,323 major competitor apps
provide	67	100	55	82 61,536 competing apps Median installs: 28,348 Avg rating: 2.7	—	—	5,453 major competitor apps
account	68	100	60	79 41,533 competing apps Median installs: 33,567 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	4,686 major competitor apps
together	71	100	55	74 20,460 competing apps Median installs: 38,864 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	2,694 major competitor apps
type	70	100	58	75 25,324 competing apps Median installs: 37,985 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	2,782 major competitor apps
choice	70	100	51	74 20,888 competing apps Median installs: 40,120 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	2,653 major competitor apps
specifically	73	100	46	69 10,294 competing apps Median installs: 22,066 Avg rating: 2.7	—	—	651 major competitor apps
guide	70	100	49	76 27,742 competing apps Median installs: 22,659 Avg rating: 2.7	—	—	2,061 major competitor apps
unit	72	100	45	62 4,386 competing apps Median installs: 26,646 Avg rating: 2.6	—	—	360 major competitor apps
random	73	100	50	68 9,895 competing apps Median installs: 42,870 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	1,316 major competitor apps
routine	72	100	43	62 4,355 competing apps Median installs: 30,512 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	485 major competitor apps
different	66	100	62	85 100,748 competing apps Median installs: 49,942 Avg rating: 3.0	—	—	14,575 major competitor apps
according	70	100	49	75 26,003 competing apps Median installs: 32,925 Avg rating: 2.6	—	—	2,321 major competitor apps
assign	71	100	52	60 3,210 competing apps Median installs: 24,621 Avg rating: 2.8	—	—	281 major competitor apps
select	68	100	64	80 48,029 competing apps Median installs: 41,636 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	5,967 major competitor apps
specify	71	100	37	57 2,243 competing apps Median installs: 27,127 Avg rating: 2.7	—	—	178 major competitor apps
suit	72	100	49	71 13,838 competing apps Median installs: 38,934 Avg rating: 2.9	—	—	1,631 major competitor apps

App Description

Methodological lifeguard app for research

The objective of this application is to provide a guide with different steps on the properties of the studies to carry out the choice of the type of design, applying the epidemiological criteria to specify the study design to be taken into account in the research.
Through the choice of the capacity to assign the study or intervention factor and the development of routine clinical practice during the study design, depending on the purpose of the study, the existence of follow-up, cause-effect direction or random assignment, and whether the unit of study is the individual, the device can be used to select the type of design that best suits each situation within a research study, specifically in the development of the methodology.
In addition, by evaluating the study according to whether or not routine clinical practice is applied, together with the evaluation of the intervention or not using a drug or medical device and the need for insurance and / or contract, the application evaluates the selection of the regulations and the procedures to be considered that best suit each research study, in order to contemplate its evaluation and approval by a Research Ethics Committee.