Salvavidas Metodológico

Developer: UIT APPs Ciudad

Category: Education

Add App to Comparison

469 installs

ratings

+3.00 weekly installs

trend steady

+3.00 monthly installs

trend steady

ASO Keyword Dashboard

Tracking 63 keywords for Salvavidas Metodológico in Google Play

Developer: UIT APPs Ciudad Real Category: education

Salvavidas Metodológico tracks 63 keywords (no keywords rank yet; 63 need traction). Key metrics: opportunity 71.3, difficulty 43.0.

Methodological lifeguard app for research

Tracked keywords

0 ranked • 63 not ranking yet

Top 10 coverage

—

Best rank — • Latest leader —

Avg opportunity

71.3

Top keyword: unit

Avg difficulty

43.0

Lower scores indicate easier wins

Opportunity leaders

unit

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.0 • Rank —

Competitors: 395
64.3
routine

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.4 • Rank —

Competitors: 524
65.3
assign

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.4 • Rank —

Competitors: 263
63.0
properties

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.1 • Rank —

Competitors: 236
61.6
direction

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.8 • Rank —

Competitors: 823
65.6

Unranked opportunities

unit

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.0 • Competitors: 395
routine

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 41.4 • Competitors: 524
assign

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 43.4 • Competitors: 263
properties

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 39.1 • Competitors: 236
direction

Opportunity: 74.0 • Difficulty: 42.8 • Competitors: 823

High competition keywords

best

Total apps: 250,582 • Major competitors: 18,395

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.5
using

Total apps: 224,577 • Major competitors: 12,364

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 57.0
whether

Total apps: 195,103 • Major competitors: 7,857

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 53.2
different

Total apps: 185,596 • Major competitors: 14,954

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 56.5
order

Total apps: 140,169 • Major competitors: 4,296

Latest rank: — • Difficulty: 51.7

All tracked keywords

Includes opportunity, difficulty, rankings and competitor benchmarks

							Major Competitors
best	66	100	57	86 250,582 competing apps Median installs: 4,202 Avg rating: 2.6	—	—	18,395 major competitor apps
order	67	100	52	82 140,169 competing apps Median installs: 557 Avg rating: 2.3	—	—	4,296 major competitor apps
device	68	100	60	80 106,281 competing apps Median installs: 3,370 Avg rating: 2.5	—	—	6,742 major competitor apps
whether	66	100	53	84 195,103 competing apps Median installs: 952 Avg rating: 2.3	—	—	7,857 major competitor apps
within	68	100	51	80 103,943 competing apps Median installs: 1,509 Avg rating: 2.3	—	—	4,171 major competitor apps
design	68	100	52	80 97,692 competing apps Median installs: 1,948 Avg rating: 2.4	—	—	4,848 major competitor apps
medical	71	100	44	72 33,281 competing apps Median installs: 1,247 Avg rating: 2.1	—	—	882 major competitor apps
used	68	100	55	81 117,205 competing apps Median installs: 3,092 Avg rating: 2.4	—	—	5,233 major competitor apps
using	66	100	57	85 224,577 competing apps Median installs: 2,832 Avg rating: 2.5	—	—	12,364 major competitor apps
provide	67	100	52	82 137,954 competing apps Median installs: 1,610 Avg rating: 2.2	—	—	5,043 major competitor apps
account	68	100	54	79 92,521 competing apps Median installs: 2,089 Avg rating: 2.6	—	—	4,917 major competitor apps
together	70	100	49	74 43,414 competing apps Median installs: 1,994 Avg rating: 2.5	—	—	2,453 major competitor apps
type	70	100	52	75 48,844 competing apps Median installs: 3,998 Avg rating: 2.5	—	—	2,839 major competitor apps
choice	71	100	48	73 39,878 competing apps Median installs: 4,476 Avg rating: 2.6	—	—	2,725 major competitor apps
specifically	72	100	44	71 27,336 competing apps Median installs: 872 Avg rating: 2.2	—	—	610 major competitor apps
guide	69	100	48	77 70,568 competing apps Median installs: 1,422 Avg rating: 2.2	—	—	2,175 major competitor apps
unit	74	100	42	64 10,868 competing apps Median installs: 1,428 Avg rating: 2.2	—	—	395 major competitor apps
random	73	100	46	69 20,272 competing apps Median installs: 3,656 Avg rating: 2.6	—	—	1,384 major competitor apps
routine	74	100	41	65 12,566 competing apps Median installs: 944 Avg rating: 2.5	—	—	524 major competitor apps
different	66	100	57	84 185,596 competing apps Median installs: 5,268 Avg rating: 2.6	—	—	14,954 major competitor apps
according	70	100	46	74 45,864 competing apps Median installs: 4,393 Avg rating: 2.3	—	—	2,127 major competitor apps
assign	74	100	43	63 8,929 competing apps Median installs: 703 Avg rating: 2.3	—	—	263 major competitor apps
select	68	100	56	80 98,487 competing apps Median installs: 3,159 Avg rating: 2.5	—	—	6,169 major competitor apps
specify	73	100	36	58 4,654 competing apps Median installs: 2,089 Avg rating: 2.3	—	—	161 major competitor apps
suit	72	100	46	71 29,110 competing apps Median installs: 2,639 Avg rating: 2.5	—	—	1,687 major competitor apps

App Description

Methodological lifeguard app for research

The objective of this application is to provide a guide with different steps on the properties of the studies to carry out the choice of the type of design, applying the epidemiological criteria to specify the study design to be taken into account in the research.
Through the choice of the capacity to assign the study or intervention factor and the development of routine clinical practice during the study design, depending on the purpose of the study, the existence of follow-up, cause-effect direction or random assignment, and whether the unit of study is the individual, the device can be used to select the type of design that best suits each situation within a research study, specifically in the development of the methodology.
In addition, by evaluating the study according to whether or not routine clinical practice is applied, together with the evaluation of the intervention or not using a drug or medical device and the need for insurance and / or contract, the application evaluates the selection of the regulations and the procedures to be considered that best suit each research study, in order to contemplate its evaluation and approval by a Research Ethics Committee.